The Merging of our Family Courts- Published by the Federal Circuit Court and Family Court of Australia

What has changed with the new Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia?

The Court has learnt a great deal during the pandemic, and as a result, has implemented many new innovations, including electronic hearings. These innovations will continue to be used as COVID-related restrictions are eased, to ensure improved safety and access to justice for vulnerable parties and people living in regional areas.

If it is safe to do so, parties will be encouraged to engage with dispute resolution opportunities before, and throughout, the Court process. For the cases that are not suitable to resolve by dispute resolution and need to proceed to a trial before a judge, the Court will provide a safe, fair and modern system of justice. The Court’s aim over time is to resolve more than 90 per cent of family law matters within 12 months to reduce the time, cost and stress associated with litigation.

Family law jurisdiction of the Court

The overarching purpose

The overarching purpose of the family law practice and procedure provisions in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) (the Act) is to facilitate the just resolution of disputes: (a) according to law; and (b) as quickly, inexpensively and efficiently as possible. This overarching purpose is reinforced in the Court’s new Central Practice Direction – Family Law Case Management. See also ss 67, 68, 190 and 191 of the Act.

Harmonised rules and practice directions

For the first time in more than 21 years there is now a single set of family law rules, known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021. A Central Practice Direction sets out guidelines for the management of family law proceedings in the Court, and a suite of 14 new practice directions have been developed to accompany the harmonised family law rules.

The creation of harmonised Rules and accompanying Practice Directions, together with a single point of entry, additional resources and case management reform, go towards streamlining the family law system.

Forms

A comprehensive review of all existing court forms has been conducted and forms in the family law, migration and general federal law jurisdictions have been updated where required. All forms are available on the Court’s website. It is important to note that a 90 day grace period (commencing from 1 September) applies, meaning old forms can still be used, but after this period, they will no longer be accepted by the Court.

New case management pathway in family law

The way that family law matters will progress through the Court has changed. In the general course, matters filed in the new Court will follow a nationally consistent case management pathway, outlined in the following diagram.

Case management flow chart

Enhanced judicial registrar resources in family law

Senior judicial registrars, judicial registrars and deputy registrars will undertake enhanced duties and roles in the early stage of proceedings to triage and case manage all family law matters. As far as possible, duty lists will be conducted by judicial registrars and interim hearings will be conducted by senior judicial registrars. This will alleviate some of the burden on judges and enable them to direct more of their time to the consideration and determination of complex interim applications and final hearings.

Pre-action procedures

The pre-action procedures previously contained in Schedule 1 to the Family Law Rules have been retained and enhanced. Pre-action procedures must be complied with prior to filing a family law application in the Court. More information is available in the diagram which outlines the Pre-action procedures.

Dispute resolution in the new case management pathway

The Court’s new case management pathway places significant emphasis on providing dispute resolution opportunities to litigants to assist them in resolving, or better identifying, the issues in dispute. The Court’s expectation is that, where it is safe to do so, parties will avail themselves of every opportunity to participate in dispute resolution.

Appeals in family law

Division 1 of the Court retains jurisdiction to hear family law appeals. However, there is no longer a separate Appeal Division. See the Appeals section of the Court’s website for more information.

Court children’s service and court child experts

The Court’s specialist service formerly known as Child Dispute Services is now known as the Court Children’s Service, and Child Dispute Services staff are now known as Court Child Experts, who will continue to fulfil a very important role.

Migration and general federal law jurisdiction of Division 2 of the Court

Division 2 of the Court will continue to have jurisdiction over migration and general federal law matters.

Other than some minor changes to the rules of court and forms, there are no substantial changes to the previous case management pathway or appeal process for migration and general federal law matters.

Family Court merger opposed by 155 stakeholders, including 13 retired judges 16 February 2021

Extracted from Family Council of Australia

More than 155 stakeholders in Australia’s family law system have now signed an Open Letter to the Attorney-General opposing the Government’s flawed bill to abolish the specialist, stand-alone Family Court.

These signatories represent a range of professions and community organisations who work with Australian families and include 11 retired Family Court and Federal Circuit Court (FCC) judges, in addition to former Chief Justices the Hon Elizabeth Evatt AC and the Hon Alastair Nicholson AO RFD QC.

The merger bill would collapse the Family Court into the generalist, chronically under-resourced and over-burdened FCC. The bill was listed without warning overnight as the first item of Government business on Tuesday, despite not being included on the Government’s draft legislative program for the Senate this week.

Stakeholders have called for three years for the merger not to be passed out of concern it would have devastating impacts on families, result in a loss of structural, systemic specialisation and dismantle the appeal division.

The Attorney-General’s Department gave evidence to the Inquiry into family, domestic and sexual violence in December 2020 that “there hasn’t been a specific study of what impact the merger would have with respect to family and domestic violence issues”, no consultation was undertaken with children’s services, children’s groups or children’s advocates in relation to the merger, and no working group was formed with the Office of Women.

In November 2020, eminent jurist and former Chief Justice, the Hon Elizabeth Evatt AC, warned that “The increasing number of cases in which issues of family violence and child abuse are raised has led to an even greater need today for family law jurisdiction to be vested exclusively in specialised judges who can give their full attention to the needs of family law clients without being diverted to exercise other unrelated jurisdictions. The current bill undermines this principle, is not in the public interest and should not be enacted.”

Law Council President Dr Jacoba Brasch QC said today, “As the impacts of the devastating shadow pandemic of family violence experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic continue, now is not the time to proceed with an unnecessary, risky bill that has been opposed by all non-government members of the House of Representatives.”

CEO of Community Legal Centres Australia, Nassim Arrage, said “the merger would move away from a specialist family court model, exposing survivors of family violence to unnecessary risk”.

Women’s Legal Services Australia spokesperson, Angela Lynch AM, said “Our opposition to the proposed merger of the family courts is centred on ensuring the safety and best interests of the child and the safety of adult victim-survivors of family violence in family law proceedings. Safety must come first in family law.”

Stakeholders continue to oppose the bill out of concern the merger will increase cost, delay and stress for families. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, the Family Court and FCC were facing delays of more than a year’s worth of cases each. Two in three FCC judges already have more than 300 matters in their dockets, some more than 600. The Chief Judge of the FCC has previously indicated that the ideal number should be around 100 each. Despite these pressures, the Government increased the FCC’s non-family law jurisdiction in December 2020.

This coalition of stakeholders calls on the Senate to vote against the merger and protect Australian families from a flawed proposal that lacks any evidential basis and is based on a discredited six-week consultancy report.

Contacts

Dr Elizabeth Evatt AC: 0411 151 367
The Hon Alastair Nicholson AO RFD QC: via the Law Council of Australia
Angela Lynch AM, Women’s Legal Services Australia: 0413 515 171
Nassim Arrage, Community Legal Centres Australia: 0408 092 256
Dr Fiona Wade, Law Council of Australia: 0403 810 865
Lucy Brown, National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services: 0435 866 462